01 July 2012 @ 08:42 am
Faction icons XXVIII  
The vote is in! Bourbon now has his own faction, demi-official in as much as the name got picked by consensus. Okay, not a lot of people bothered to mention a preference. However, the tally stands at three for the Musketeers versus two for the Bourbons.

We also have the Denied, for that name was unanimously chosen (albeit by only three people) for a faction for Emily Weiss.

With these, I toss in a couple of others that I've mentioned before in passing. Jenny Schanke has never officially had a faction, though she appears in a fair amount of fan fiction. So here's the icon for the Jenny-Poos. And, though an old and significant faction like the NatPack must cover a lot of ground, there should be room for a smallish subfaction of LabNatties.




Musketeers:

According to the Season Three "bible", Bourbon was supposedly a Musketeer in sixteenth-century France before being brought across. Of course, none of this made it into any of the episodes, for he was the least seen of Vachon's crew. Nevertheless, it is backstory that has flavoured some fan fiction.

As the word suggests, a musketeer is a soldier armed with a musket. However, in France the Musketeers of the Guard were dragoons (i.e. mounted infantry) in the Royal Household, and largely comprised of minor nobility. As Wikipedia puts it, "The Musketeers soon gained a reputation for boisterousness and fighting spirit because the only way for social and career advancement was excelling at their task as mounted light dragoons." Whence, of course, the characters in Dumas's novel.

I've based the icon design on their flag (which you can see here). The central design has been lightened a bit so that it won't overwhelm the figures; but the colour of the crowns in the corners is more heavily saturated, and I picked shades from it for the logo.

Besides the usual screen capture of the character, I also included the figure of a Musketeer in uniform, cropped from an old picture that I found here.




LabNatties:

Naturally, I used the turquoise tiled wall of Natalie's office as the background for the LabNatties' icon, and picked a screen capture of her at work. I would actually have preferred her at the autopsy table; but the best pictures all ran full screen height, down to her waist and up to either the scale or the hanging light, and as such took up too much of the space. So, in the end, I picked a picture of her at the microscope.

The anatomical diagram, X-ray, and hazardous waste bin were all found on the 'Net. However, similar things were familiar sights. They just got shown partially, or in the distance, or skewed at an angle that made it hard to fit them nicely into an icon.

The symbol of the NatPack is a caduceus; and, at first, I thought I'd (naturally!) use the same one that I've employed in other icons. However, it did not fit texturally with the other things in the design. I decided, therefore, to pick a simpler drawn caduceus. This I then fitted into the logo, substituting it for the Ts in "LabNatties". I tried using one caduceus, and then superimposing a pair in the same space (one for each T, you see). In the end, though, it worked better if I used one top with two tails.




Jenny-Poos:

We never really met Jenny, for all that Schanke often talked about her. Like her mother (and, in Season Three, Tracy's father), Jenny was an off-screen character. Nevertheless, in one episode, we saw the annual police picnic, where Schanke knelt down to speak to a young child. Even the sex was indeterminate, since the view was from behind. Nevertheless, some fans assume that this was Jenny. So that had to be the picture I used, being the only one.

Also associated with the character is a school assignment she was given in which she was supposed to describe what a father is. Schanke promptly took it upon himself to help her; and, at one point, hauled out the crumpled assignment sheet to look at. This, then, is the other main feature of the icon.

Since Jenny is clearly quite young, I used a script font in the sort of style used by an elementary school teacher when the class is just learning cursive. To accentuate the effect, I added a set of fine guide lines marking the loops of the letters.




The Denied:

We know little about Emily Weiss that can be used to elaborate the icon for her affiliation. I therefore focused on her latest novel, the title of which provides the name of the faction. There is no perfect image of it in any of the screen captures; but the best of them can be edited to remove the fingers holding the book and fill out the edges of the book jacket. This and the screen capture dominate the design. Indeed, given the prominent title on the book, I did not bother to complicate the layout by duplicating the name in a logo.

The background has simply been trimmed from a shot of the bookstore in which she did a signing. Since most of it is covered by the main design, I copied the actual bit showing the table where Emily is sitting, and fitted it into the one empty spot, down in the lower right corner. It's not exactly clear; but it adds some interest to the space.
 
 
( Post a new comment )
[identity profile] foxy11814.livejournal.com on July 1st, 2012 02:30 pm (UTC)
All the icons are great. As for the Jenny-Poo icon, I always assumed the child was a boy. He's wearing blue and Schanke tells him to stay away from the girls if I'm not mistaken. I've always toyed with the idea that he had more than one child. Schanke has even said "kids" in a few episodes. Regardless, all of them are very good.
[identity profile] greerwatson.livejournal.com on July 3rd, 2012 02:06 pm (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in answering. You know (and from your posts, you definitely do know) what holidays can be like. I looked at the three-day weekend and thought of all the things that I could do with the extra time—and my mother looked at the same weekend and...had her own plans.

However, I've now had a chance to get out my tape and look at the end of "Dead Issue".

You aren't the first to say that the child Schanke is talking to is a boy. On the other hand, I know I'm not alone in assuming that it has to be Jenny. I think that's because of the way he acts. I mean, one might have a quick word with someone else's kid who's been fighting; but one would hardly send them off with a light smack on the bottom. You just don't lay hands on other people's children, even people you know well. That's a very paternal gesture.

The blue clothes are, in my mind, irrelevant. The sweater is striped in turquoise and a softish mid-blue shade, which is hardly unequivocally masculine! (After all, when I was a kid, my younger sister had a T-shirt that was lightish blue with a pattern of little sailboats with red sails. I did not grow up in a "pink/blue" household.)

Rather more telling, to my mind, is the wording of Schanke's scolding. Which I have just transcribed!
Did you hear what I said? Play nice. Don't fight.   [pause]   Stay away from the girls. Now get going.
[He gives the kid a light smack on the bottom, and the kid runs off. Schanke gets up as Nick comes on screen.]
Clearly this is quite a young child: the phrase "play nice" is hardly one that would be used to anyone over the age of eight. Kids that age might still play in mixed groups. (It's right around the age when the sexes start separating.) And girls that age do certainly sometimes get in fights, with boys as well as girls. (I speak from my own experience!) No, to me the key phrase is "stay away from the girls".

You see, if this is Jenny, and she's got mixed up in a fight among a unisex female group, then one would expect Schanke to tell her to "stay away from the other girls". That's true regardless of whether he expects that she will then go to play with the boys, do something on her own, or stick with her mother. The lack of the word "other" does suggest that Schanke is talking here to a boy. However, his tone and actions also suggest that the kid is his own child. I must say that I don't recall that we ever hear him mention that he has any other children. Certainly not by name.

So I quite see why this scene leads you to say that you toy with the idea that Schanke had more than one child. Can you remember in which episodes he mentioned "kids"?



Edited 2012-07-03 02:09 pm (UTC)
[identity profile] greerwatson.livejournal.com on July 3rd, 2012 02:21 pm (UTC)
By the way, you do realize that, from what Schanke says, the kid has presumably been fighting with one or more of the girls. (Not with a boy.)

Certainly, the kid must have been fighting, since that is the cause of the admonition. And, since it's specifically the girls whom s/he is to stay away from, it follows that the other participant(s) in the fight must have been among the girls. Otherwise it makes no sense to order him/her to stay away from them. (This is visibly a young child, after all: a kid under the age of ten. We're not talking about a girl-chasing teenager.)

So, is this a boy who was fighting with a girl? Or is it a girl who squabbled with some of the other girls, got into a fist fight, and is now being told to stay clear of the entire group lest the fight start up again?
[identity profile] foxy11814.livejournal.com on July 4th, 2012 02:27 pm (UTC)
I don't know. I think if the child got in a fight he or she would be crying and upset, especially if it was a girl. I think the producers just threw a boy in there. It looks like a boy to me, but like you said, it's open to interpretation. FK messes up continuity throughout the series. For example, is Myra's mom dead or not? Did Janette really sire someone or not? In the case of one episode where Schanke said "kids," it was in episode "Dying to Know You," when he's on the phone with Myra. That's one off the top of my head. He thought she might be cheating and he said he worked overtime for her and the kids. Of course, there are plenty of episodes to suggest there was one child because he does simply say "kid" in a lot of episodes. Not to mention, in "Hunters," Nick and Schanke are worried about Myra and Jenny, surely if there was a son, they'd be worried about him, too, lol. Unless he spends a lot of time with the dead or not dead grandmother, LMBO. I see both points of view. Yes, it is more probable that there is only one child. Far more evidence supports it. Besides, the boy could have been a nephew or a son of a close friend who hangs with Jenny all the time and was mad the girls weren't letting him play. Or it could be Jenny. =) I always thought it was a boy. LOL You were the first one to suggest to me that it was Jenny and that's cool. =)
[identity profile] greerwatson.livejournal.com on July 4th, 2012 03:27 pm (UTC)
Why on earth would a child be crying after getting in a fight? I mean, if the kid was beaten up, sure. But kids usually throw a punch because they're mad at someone. I don't recall anyone ever bursting into tears! And, if only one kid is being told off, it would be the one who lost his/her temper.

However, you are so right about the continuity issues! Quite notorious some of them, too.
[identity profile] foxy11814.livejournal.com on July 4th, 2012 07:07 pm (UTC)
As a school teacher, I can tell you even the older ones on both sides will cry because they are so mad or were scared. To me, it was a scene that looked like Schanke was comforting him and fixing his clothes. You never know. All of this is speculative. But yeah, I've seen numerous fights, even had to separate some and crying is involved, even outside of school. =)
(Anonymous) on July 4th, 2012 04:12 am (UTC)
I'm on my phone, so I'll do a better response later. One episode is "Dying to Know You" when hes on the phone with Myra. He told her he was working overtime for her and the kids. The show always had continuity problems. For example, they contract each other on Myra's mother being dead or not.