Having recently got into the Biggles books, I keep thinking about them. So (I hope) some of these thoughts will gel into wee mini-essays here on Dreamwidth, if only so I can go on to do more thinking, hopefully about other things. Even if it's other Biggles-related things!
So here's a bit of an introduction.
With the exception of the first few stories, which were written for a general audience, Capt. W.E. Johns’ Biggles books are adventure stories marketed to boys around ten or twelve years old. His hero, James C. Bigglesworth (nicknamed “Biggles”), and his friends are pilots who travel the world foiling spies, smugglers, thieves or what have you, and locating stolen goods, lost treasure, kidnapped scientists, and top-secret documents. With over a hundred volumes, many of which are collections of short stories, the series would—at least on the face of it—seem to be about as likely to fix my interest as the Tom Swift books that fascinated me when I was ten or twelve. Which is to say enormously at that age and not at all today.
So what is the attraction of Biggles? After all, if you read enough of the books, you quickly see that Johns reuses the same handful of tropes multiple times. True, the stories tend to be well-plotted and exciting; but one would think that my interest would be quickly exhausted just as, long ago, I tired of Tom Swift. The fact is, though, that I am constitutionally inclined to organize and analyze data—whatever data!—and have been finding in the Biggles series rather more of interest than mere adventure. (Though, mind you, they are a lot of fun.) ( Fans tend to divide the series into four eras: WW1, interwar, WW2, and post-war. )
When I first decided to try reading the Biggles series, I started with a few I had picked up in the '90s, mostly ones set in the WW2 period. Then I jumped around a bit, reading the stories that got mentioned the most by other fans, since secondhand books do cost money. However, once I realized that I could get them on line, I started them in chronological order, one by one. That has its own interest, actually: you see how the series evolved.
So I keep seeing comparisons between books, relevance to contemporary history, re-use of favourite motifs, and such. I’m hoping that, now and then, I’ll get the time/energy to put some of that down in bits of meta. Or lit. crit., depending on how you want to look at it.
So here's a bit of an introduction.
With the exception of the first few stories, which were written for a general audience, Capt. W.E. Johns’ Biggles books are adventure stories marketed to boys around ten or twelve years old. His hero, James C. Bigglesworth (nicknamed “Biggles”), and his friends are pilots who travel the world foiling spies, smugglers, thieves or what have you, and locating stolen goods, lost treasure, kidnapped scientists, and top-secret documents. With over a hundred volumes, many of which are collections of short stories, the series would—at least on the face of it—seem to be about as likely to fix my interest as the Tom Swift books that fascinated me when I was ten or twelve. Which is to say enormously at that age and not at all today.
So what is the attraction of Biggles? After all, if you read enough of the books, you quickly see that Johns reuses the same handful of tropes multiple times. True, the stories tend to be well-plotted and exciting; but one would think that my interest would be quickly exhausted just as, long ago, I tired of Tom Swift. The fact is, though, that I am constitutionally inclined to organize and analyze data—whatever data!—and have been finding in the Biggles series rather more of interest than mere adventure. (Though, mind you, they are a lot of fun.) ( Fans tend to divide the series into four eras: WW1, interwar, WW2, and post-war. )
When I first decided to try reading the Biggles series, I started with a few I had picked up in the '90s, mostly ones set in the WW2 period. Then I jumped around a bit, reading the stories that got mentioned the most by other fans, since secondhand books do cost money. However, once I realized that I could get them on line, I started them in chronological order, one by one. That has its own interest, actually: you see how the series evolved.
So I keep seeing comparisons between books, relevance to contemporary history, re-use of favourite motifs, and such. I’m hoping that, now and then, I’ll get the time/energy to put some of that down in bits of meta. Or lit. crit., depending on how you want to look at it.
Leave a comment