greerwatson (
greerwatson) wrote2020-07-13 02:40 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Sunshine Challenge 2020 - Prompt 4 (Green) - Take 2

As someone who likes green, I look at it in comparison with other colours, and I think it gets sadly short-changed. I mean, just consider this:
YELLOW | YELLOW | ||
ORANGE | GREEN | ||
RED | GREEN | ||
BROWN | GREEN |
I mean, sure, we have names for the different greens. I'd call the lighter one "lime" and the muted one "olive". But they are still considered to be types of green. Suppose you had T-shirts striped like this:
The first one is striped in orange & yellow, the second in red & yellow, and the third in brown & yellow. However, as far as the others are concerned, if you were given any one of them on its own, you'd probably describe it as being green & yellow.
Of course, we do have names for specific shades of green: ivy green, spruce green, emerald green, spinach green and so on; but these are comparable to "canary yellow", "daffodil yellow", "sunshine yellow", and the like. The point is that lime is as different as orange, and olive as different as brown; but neither is considered to be a totally separate colour.
In fact, it gets more complicated when we look at colours that lie between lime (on the one hand) and orange (on the other hand) and pure yellow. Colours that are almost yellow.
You can run a sequence of interpolating these shades between yellow and either orange or (lime) green:
But if you compare them instead with red and its equivalent shade of green, they look practically yellow! (But not quite.)
When you look at them all together, you can see that they're the missing part of the sequence: you need these additional colours in order to get a proper gradation.
They don't have separate names, though. There really aren't enough names for colours.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
💚
Color names are at their most frustrating when the marketing people get involved (so clothing catalogs and home decor). They'll outright mislabel things or give them entirely unhelpful names like (this is an actual example of a paint chip in a hardware store) "Miami Sunset". I honestly don't even remember what color that was; I just remember being annoyed by it. Orange? Yellow? Pink?
Artist's paints are pretty consistently labeled at least. (So you can order a tube of "sap green" without even looking at a sample and be pretty confident of what you'll get) Of course, that still doesn't give you all the colors, because artist's paints are meant to be mixed. Many brands don't even sell many shades of green, since green can be created so easily with yellow and blue. (Look at how many different shades of yellow or blue you can buy of these paints and how few shades of green are for sale: Winsor Newton color chart)
I always find it fascinating that people recognize "pink" as a distinct color from "red" but cannot make a distinction between a pastel pea green and a deep forest green. I think it really just comes down to the words. (I'm honestly dreading the blue-vs-indigo debate that's about to rage.)
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
Re: 💚
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I'm beginning to think there's been an arbitrary wavelength that's been determined to be the unmarked version of the color and everything else is some other shade or color that requires a descriptive adjective or another name applied.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)